How Phages Shrink a Population Until Luck Takes Over
by Stephen T. Abedon Ph.D.
phage.org | phage-therapy.org | biologyaspoetry.org | abedon.phage.org | google scholar
Jump to: ✍️ Take | 📚 All Takes | 🧮 Calculators
Version 2026.06.07 | First Posted 2026-06-07
phage.org/takes/genetic_drift.html · Abedon’s Books · DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-94309-7_7
How can I improve this page? contact: takes@phage.org
Darwin gave us survival of the fittest, and it is true — but it was never the whole story. A population’s genes can shift for a second reason that has nothing to do with fitness: plain luck. And phages, as it happens, are unusually good at arranging the conditions under which luck takes the wheel.
The principle behind it is just sampling error. In a vast population, chance cancels out — the lucky breaks and the bad breaks average away, and the fitter variant reliably wins. Shrink the population, though, and that averaging fails; randomness begins to dominate, and fitness loses its power to predict what survives. Past a certain smallness, a beneficial gene can simply vanish — not outcompeted, merely unlucky. Biologists call this genetic drift. Where natural selection edits a population by merit, drift edits it by accident — and in a small enough population, accident wins.
This is where phages come in. A lytic outbreak can scythe a bacterial population down to a remnant — a bottleneck — in a matter of hours, and a population reduced to a handful of survivors is a population handed over to chance. So a phage is, among its other roles, a manufacturer of luck: not by choosing which bacteria live, but simply by making the survivors few.
But — and this is the catch that keeps the story honest — a phage cannot always pull this off. To bloom into the numbers needed to crash a population, the phages first need a great many bacteria to consume, since each new virion must find a host of its own. Let the bacteria grow too sparse and the phages can’t multiply fast enough to matter; they fizzle. A thin population is, paradoxically, a safe one — a “numerical refuge.” It is the dense crowd that feeds the bloom that then culls the crowd back down to a remnant. Density buys the catastrophe. And because bacteria tend to clump, a population that looks sparse on average can still offer dense pockets where a bloom can catch.
When the cull does come, what follows is not a judgment but a lottery. The rarest variants almost all disappear; but now and then one rides the chaos up to a prominence it never earned; and even genuinely useful genes can be lost for no reason whatsoever. Variation is stripped from the population — the same result natural selection produces, but reached through luck rather than merit.
There is a gentler route to the same place. A prophage can hand its host a new trick — a gene that lets the bacterium colonize some niche it couldn’t manage before — and the few cells that found that new outpost carry only a thin slice of the parent population’s diversity. Drift by colonization, a founder effect. How durable such founder events really are in bacteria, which barely have sex and wall one another off only loosely, is a fair question, and an open one.
Drift, then, is evolution’s other way of throwing variation overboard: selection does it by merit, drift by luck, and phages can drive the second without ever preferring one gene to another — purely by making a population small. Survival of the fittest gets the headlines. But phages, blooming and crashing their way through bacterial populations, quietly arrange a great deal of survival of the luckiest.
▸ Full calculator suite & development status (calculators.phage.org)